The Supreme Court ruled that lower courts must limit injunctions to the parties before them, preventing nationwide orders ...

AV Ristorante is a recurring series by Brian Fitzpatrick. Please note that the views of outside contributors do not reflect ...

A New York appeals court overturned the $500 million civil fraud penalty against Donald Trump, deeming it excessive under the Eighth Amendment. While upholding non-financial sanctions, the court found ...

If a judge enters a final judgment in a given case declaring an executive order unconstitutional, the administration may not ...

With nationwide injunctions on NIH funding cuts and immigration policies circulating the courts, The Chronicle asked Duke Law ...

By curbing nationwide injunctions, the court prevents judges from acting as de facto rulers over national policy. Ultimately, the Supreme Court’s decision is a victory for democracy and judicial ...

In sharp contrast, in April 2024, the Harvard Law Review identified 127 nationwide injunctions since 1963, with 96 of them packed into a three-year period from 2020 to 2023. It counted six ...

Key Points ・Today's Supreme Court ruling limits federal courts from issuing nationwide injunctions. ・The SAVE Plan's current injunction by the 8th Circuit likely remains in place, unless the ...

Those injunctions prompted the federal Judicial Conference to ensure that constitutional cases were allocated at random among several judicial districts so as not to be decided by a single judge.