The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit ...

More websites, including Wikipedia and academic archives, are grousing about AI freeloaders that siphon their information.

An analysis found that about 40% of over 1,000 randomly selected Wikipedia articles contain outdated or incorrect information ...

Andrew Huberman, a respected neuroscientist and popular science communicator, has found himself at the center of a digital storm. Once celebrated for bringing science into the mainstream, he’s now the ...

Wikipedia halts its AI summary rollout after human editors raise concerns about credibility. Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add and edit entries. Recently, it rolled out AI summaries ...

Following The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Atlantic, the online encyclopedia now has daily activities ...

Editors almost immediately criticized the pilot, raising concerns that it could damage Wikipedia's credibility.

First reported by Kotaku, Wikipedia recently introduced a quiz game on its official Android app, called Which Came First? The game has a simple premise, which you could probably g ...

Following a slew of complaints from editors, a Wikimedia Foundation spokesperson confirmed to 404 Media that it’s pausing the two-week test, which began on June 2nd. The experiment put AI-generated ...

According to 404 Media, Wikipedia announced the opt-in AI pilot on June 2, which was set to run for two weeks on the mobile version of the site. The summaries appeared at the top of select articles in ...

The Wikimedia Foundation, a nonprofit group that hosts, develops, and controls Wikipedia, has announced that it won’t be moving forward with plans to add AI-generated summaries to articles after ...